**Introduction to CMI**** – 1**

The new *natural* start of the beginning with nothing discloses -again and again- * Nature’s* oerprinciple of an inseparable two-oneness and its (logic +

*logistic*) order to be followed in a consequent & consistent way.

When this is respected, the

*first four*

*natural*(counting) numbers did confirm their two-oneness by disclosing their inseparable relations with three independent directions in space, although

*Nature*did not provide an objective method to define & quantisize them. But the identification of

*natural*(counting) number “five with its beta-symbol

**5**” f

*ailed to be a two-oneness*by

*not*offering a second possibility, this necessitates a return to

*natural*(counting) number one 1 disclosing a

*new second*two-oneness hidden so far, being the inseparable relation between

**Đ1**as

*oerdimension of geometry and*

*as oerdimension of*

**Đ2***dynamics*making

**Đ1**also ambiguous …

This confirmation of * Nature’s* oerprinciple of an inseparable two-oneness did also necessitate to identify the fundamental differences between

*mathematics*

**N**ature’s dynamic**+**,

**plus**,

**&**,

**and**“static & immobile mathematics of homo sapiens”. Since

*shows to have*

**N**ature*no*secrets, even when it would take thousands of years till results of human curiosity, observations and intelligence did arrive at new findings, it can also be no surprise that

*start of its beginning with nothing is also emphasizing “t*

**N**ature’s*he importance to watch the power of powers*“. This is also disclosing the simple solution of the great mystery of Fermat’s Last Theorem –

**FLT**– of 1637CE, no longer being the too complicated solution as presented by Andrew Wiles at the end of last century, only accessible to a few highly specialized static & immobile mathematicians… The simple confirmation of

*oer-principles are also dealing with the*

**N**ature’s*complex*structure of Descartes’ Universe as inseparable two-oneness, now available to everyone…

As serendipic surprise, the new* natural* start of the beginning with nothing provides also the ultimate solution of Riemann’s **Z**eta- Hypothesis which has been cracking the minds of all static & immobile mathematicians ever since 1859CE, showing how the *nine* pages of his *Habilitation* of 1854CE and the “*Non-Euclidean* concept” of his professor Gauss can’t be properly understood, being not in accordance with * Nature’s *oer-conditions

*….*

The

*‘s solution/ respons, showing step by step the surprising fact that Riemann came very close to*

**N***Nature’s*truth when he tried

*various*kinds of new methods in attempts to get a hold of

*rimes and their*

**p***distribution*on the boundless, unlimited and infinite long line of

*natural*(counting) numbers as

**Z-**radial of the Universe…