**… dedicated to increasing and disseminating mathematical knowledge**

**CMI** grew out of the longstanding belief of its founder, **Mr. Landon T. Clay***, in the value of mathematical knowledge and its centrality to human progress, culture, and intellectual life.*

Discussions over some years with Professor Arthur Jaffe helped shape Mr. Clay’s ideas how the advancement of mathematics could best be supported. These discussions resulted in the incorporation of the Institute on September 25, 1998, under Professor Jaffe’s leadership.

The primary objectives and purposes of the **C**lay **M**athematics **I**nstitute are

“*to increase and disseminate mathematical knowledge; to educate mathematicians and other scientists about new discoveries in the field of mathematics; to encourage gifted students to pursue mathematical careers; and to recognize extraordinary achievements and advances in mathematical research.*”

CMI seeks to “*further the beauty, power and universality of mathematical thinking*.”**CMI **is located in** Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK & Peterborough, NH, 03458, USA, ****www.claymath.org**

** Two submenu’s**The

*natural*start of

*Nature’s*beginning with nothing did allow me to discover

**CMI- Clays Mathematics Institute**and their

*seven*selected

**MPP – Millennium Prize Problems**to celebrate the arrival of the

*third*millennium (the

*second*one presenting 23 problems chosen by the German mathematician Hilbert) .

Now

*first*part of

*“*

**N**ature’s**” is based on no thing and the**

__All Unifying Theory – AuTheo__*N**second*part on the creation of “some thing”, this separation its perfectly matching the two

**CMI – MPP’s**.

**PART I **starts with the identification of *a point of no thing* showing how * Nature’s* oer-conditions are leading to “the structure of the Universe”, all based on

*no*thing, that is “

*before*

*the beginning*of the creation of some thing out of no thing”…

Submenu

**CMI – 1**presents the final verdict of the “

**” of the German mathematician Georg Friedrich Bernhard Riemann [1826 -1866CE] as presented in the year when he succeeded Peter Gustav L. Dirichlet [1805-1859CE] as Head of the Mathematic Department of the Göttingen University, who succeeded the great geodesist and mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss [1777-1855CE] who happened to be Riemann’s professor. In spite of many attempts, Riemann’s**

__Zeta- hypothesis__**Z**eta- Hypothesis is unsolved since its presentation in 1859CE.

**PART II** shows how continuing to respect the *logistic* order of * Nature’s* logic is leading to the disclosure of the

*third*oerdimension and

*cycle of creation of “some thing out of no thing”: the*

**N**ature’s*eight octoquants*in each

*complex*cylinder during each new period of t

**ime.**

*h*Submenu

**CMI – 2**presents the solution of another

**CMI – MPP**roblem: the “

**of**

__Yang-Mills____Theorem__*missing mass*in Universe”, showing how

*All Unifying Theory – AuTheo*

**N**ature’s**and its**

*N**Synchro-*Super-Symmetry to the

*very special*, unique & unambiguous

**Ð0**– point of no thing, the Oersprong of All, hence

*no*mass

*nor*some thing is missing…

The original **MPP-** descriptions and conditions can be found at http://www.claymath.org/.

As sole author of *Nature’s* “All Unifying Theory- AuTheo** N **“I herewith claim the solution of two

**CMI- M**illennium

**P**rize

**P**roblems:

**CMI – 1**

**of 1859CE and**

__Riemann’s Zeta Hypothesis__**CMI – 2**

__Yang – Mills Hypothesis of__*Missing mass*in Universe

The new *natural* start of the beginning with nothing discloses -again and again- * Nature’s* oerprinciple of an inseparable two-oneness and its (logic +

*logistic*) order to be followed in a consequent & consistent way.

When this is respected, the

*first four*

*natural*(counting) numbers did confirm their two-oneness by disclosing their inseparable relations with three independent directions in space, although

*Nature*did not provide an objective method to define & quantisize them. But the identification of

*natural*(counting) number “five with its beta-symbol

**5**” f

*ailed to be a two-oneness*by

*not*offering a second possibility, this necessitates a return to

*natural*(counting) number one

**1**, disclosing a

*new second*two-oneness hidden so far: this restores the inseparable relation between

**Đ1**as

*oerdimension of geometry and*

*as oerdimension of*

**Đ2***dynamics, also*making

**Đ1**ambiguous because all (unidentified) points on the radius are now

*–*except its origin…

This confirmation of * Nature’s* exclusive oer-principle of an “inseparable two-oneness” did also necessitate to identify the fundamental differences between

*mathematics and the evident “static & immobile” mathematics of homo sapiens. Since*

**N**ature’s dynamic*shows to have*

**N**ature*no*secrets, even when it would take thousands of years till results of human curiosity, observations and intelligence did arrive at new findings, it can also be no surprise that

*start of its beginning with nothing is also emphasizing “t*

**N**ature’s*he importance to watch the power of powers*“. This is also disclosing the simple solution of the great mystery of Fermat’s Last Theorem –

**FLT**– of 1637CE, no longer being the too complicated solution as presented by Andrew Wiles at the end of last century, which is said to be only understood by a few highly specialized static & immobile mathematicians… But when

*oer-principles are followed, all is leading to the*

**N**ature’s*complex*structure of Descartes’ Universe its inseparable two-oneness now being available to everyone…

As serendipic surprise, the new* natural* start of the beginning with nothing provides also the ultimate solution of Riemann’s **Z**eta- Hypothesis which has been cracking the minds of all static & immobile mathematicians ever since 1859CE, showing how the *nine* pages of his *Habilitation* of 1854CE and the “*Non-Euclidean* concept” of his professor Gauss can never be properly understood, because they are not in accordance with * Nature’s *oer-conditions

*….*

The free

*‘s solution/ respons, showing step by step the surprising fact that Riemann came very close to*

**N***truth when he tried*

**N**ature’s*various*kinds of new methods, including (upright printed) complex variables, in attempts to get hold of

*rimes and their*

**p***distribution*on the boundless, unlimited and infinite long local line as his real

**X-**axis or on the

*natural*(counting) numbers as one of the

*first*generation

**Z-**radials of the Universe…